How we know · 25 decisions · 42 sources
Research, not opinions.
The decisions
Your routeLose about 0.5% of your weight a weekLosing slowly keeps more muscle. In one trial, athletes who lost slowly even added some.Strong
What the studies found
Elite athletes who lost about 0.7% of their weight a week gained 2.1% lean mass and lost 31% of their fat. Those losing 1.4% a week lost 21% of their fat and their lean mass did not change. Across training studies, an energy deficit held back lean-mass gains, though strength still improved.
What it means for you
0.4 kg a week is 0.5% of your 77 kg, inside the 0.5 to 1% a week these studies and contest-prep guidance support.
Sources
- Garthe et al. 2011 Effect of two different weight-loss rates on body composition and strength and power-related performance in elite athletesInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab · RCT, 24 elite athletes · abstract checked
- Murphy & Koehler 2022 Energy deficiency impairs resistance training gains in lean mass but not strength: A meta-analysis and meta-regressionScand J Med Sci Sports · meta-analysis and meta-regression of RCTs · abstract checked
- Helms et al. 2014 Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementationJ Int Soc Sports Nutr · narrative review · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/roadmap.ts FAT_LOSS_FRACTION_BW_PER_WEEK
Your routeThe faster pace needs fat to spareFat stores can only release so much energy a day. Diet harder than that and the gap comes out of muscle.Estimate
What the studies found
A model built from underfeeding studies puts the most the fat store can supply at about 290 kJ (69 kcal) per kg of fat per day, and says a deficit beyond that takes fat-free mass straight away. It is a model, not a trial, so we plan under it, at 48.5 kcal per kg of fat.
What it means for you
With the fat you carry, the deepest deficit we plan is about 650 kcal a day, so the fastest pace offered to you is 0.5% a week.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/lossRate.ts FAT_ENERGY_RELEASE_KCAL_PER_KG_PER_DAY
Your routeRecomp keeps the deficit under 500 kcalIn training studies, a deficit of about 500 kcal a day was enough to stop muscle gains.Strong
What the studies found
A meta-regression of resistance-training trials found an energy deficit of about 500 kcal a day prevented lean-mass gains, and the authors advise against deficits larger than that when muscle is the goal. Strength gains were not affected by the deficit.
What it means for you
Your recomp runs about 450 kcal under maintenance, below that line, so building muscle while losing fat is still realistic.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/roadmap.ts RECOMP_DEFICIT_CEILING_KCAL_PER_DAY
Your routeEase in at about 0.5% a weekIf you already train, a small deficit can trim fat while your muscle keeps growing.Estimate
What the studies found
In a 10-week trial of 30 trained people on high protein, a moderate deficit lost 2.9 kg of fat and gained 1.0 kg of lean mass, while eating at maintenance lost 1.4 kg of fat and gained the same lean mass. The fat-loss difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
What it means for you
You chose to ease in, so the scale moves about 0.4 kg a week. This is one small trial, so treat the pace as a best estimate.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/roadmap.ts EASE_FRACTION_BW_PER_WEEK
Your routeFor men, 10 to 15% body fat is the sweet spotRaters liked men at moderate leanness and muscle best. The very leanest bodies did not score highest.Good
What the studies found
Across six studies, men with moderate muscularity were rated most attractive. When observers set fat and muscle on male bodies themselves, they chose levels within the healthy range. A 2025 study of 283 raters in three countries, using real DXA scans, reportedly found the peak at about 13 to 14% body fat.
What it means for you
Your goal of 13% is measured against that band. These are ratings of photos by mostly Western raters, not a promise about real life.
Sources
- Frederick & Haselton 2007 Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesisPers Soc Psychol Bull · six studies of rated attractiveness · abstract checked
- Brierley et al. 2016 The Body and the Beautiful: Health, Attractiveness and Body Composition in Men's and Women's BodiesPLoS One · 63 observers adjusting fat and muscle on body images · abstract checked
- Xia et al. 2025 The relationship between body fatness and physical attractiveness in malesPers Individ Dif · 283 raters, 15 male DXA scans, three countries · via a secondary source
In the code: src/utils/attractivenessTargets.ts ATTRACTIVE_BF_RANGE
Your routeNatural muscle tops out near an FFMI of 25In one study, drug-free athletes topped out at a muscle-for-height score of about 25, so goals past it are flagged.Estimate
What the studies found
Among 157 male athletes, the 74 who did not use steroids had fat-free mass indexes reaching a well-defined limit of 25.0, while many users went past it. The authors called the limit preliminary, and some people exceed it naturally.
What it means for you
Your goal works out to an FFMI of about 22.4. Near or past 25 we show it as uncommon, not impossible.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/roadmap.ts FFMI_CEILING
Your routeBuild about 0.10 kg of muscle a weekMuscle grows slowly and slows each year you train, and people differ, so the time is a range.Estimate
What the studies found
In 49 trials, resistance training alone added about 1.1 kg of lean mass over roughly 13 weeks, and extra protein added about 0.3 kg more. Men gain more muscle in absolute terms, but women gain about the same relative to the muscle they start with. How fast gains slow over the years is our assumption, not a measurement.
What it means for you
From your training history and frame, about 0.10 kg a week, give or take about a third.
Sources
- Morton et al. 2018 A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adultsBr J Sports Med · meta-analysis, 49 RCTs, 1,863 participants · full text checked
- Refalo et al. 2025 Sex differences in absolute and relative changes in muscle size following resistance training in healthy adults: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysisPeerJ · meta-analysis, 29 studies · abstract checked
- Roberts et al. 2020 Sex Differences in Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJ Strength Cond Res · meta-analysis · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/roadmap.ts GAIN_DECAY_K, RATE_SPREAD, FFMI_UNTRAINED
Your routeBuild up to 18%, trim back to 12%This range is your choice of how lean to stay. No study shows one range builds more muscle than another.Estimate
What the studies found
When 34 men overate by 40% for 8 weeks, those who started with more body fat gained more weight and more fat. In a trial of 61 trained adults, dieting in blocks with breaks and dieting straight through kept the same lean mass and strength, and the block dieters felt less hungry.
What it means for you
You chose the balanced way, so you build up to about 18% and trim back to 12%.
Sources
- Galgani et al. 2025 Baseline Body Fat Percentage Is Associated to Weight and Fat Mass Gain From High-Fat Overfeeding Over 8 WeeksJ Clin Endocrinol Metab · overfeeding trial, 34 men · abstract checked
- Peos et al. 2021 Continuous versus Intermittent Dieting for Fat Loss and Fat-Free Mass Retention in Resistance-trained Adults: The ICECAP TrialMed Sci Sports Exerc · RCT, 61 resistance-trained adults · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/operatingBands.ts OPERATING_BANDS
Your routeWomen's plans stop at 22% body fatVery lean women risk losing their period, so plans keep a safety margin above that point.Estimate
What the studies found
Female physique athletes measured off-season averaged 23.4% body fat by DXA. Among those not on hormonal contraception, 27% had no periods, against none of the regular gym-goers. The study is small and cross-sectional, so 22% is a safety margin, not a proven threshold.
What it means for you
The leanest your plan takes you is 12%.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/operatingBands.ts OPERATING_BANDS (female floors), leanStopFor
Your routeExpect some fat with the muscleEven a planned surplus adds fat alongside muscle. A bigger one adds more fat, not more muscle.Estimate
What the studies found
Elite athletes given a planned surplus gained more weight than those eating freely, but the extra was fat: fat mass rose 15% against 3%, and lean mass gains did not differ. An off-season review advises a surplus of about 10 to 20% and slower gains for advanced lifters.
What it means for you
Your plan assumes about 0.5 kg of fat for every kg of muscle, so a build ends a little softer and the next trim takes it off.
Sources
- Garthe et al. 2013 Effect of nutritional intervention on body composition and performance in elite athletesEur J Sport Sci · RCT, 39 elite athletes · abstract checked
- Iraki et al. 2019 Nutrition Recommendations for Bodybuilders in the Off-Season: A Narrative ReviewSports (Basel) · narrative review · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/syntheticNutritionAnswers.ts FAT_PER_LEAN_KG
Your routePhases end on your weight, not a body-fat readingBody-fat readings are too rough to see a few kilos of change. A weight trend can.Good
What the studies found
Even a DXA scan, repeated on consecutive days in 21 trained athletes, varied by about 1.3 kg of fat mass, and home body-fat scales are less precise still. In one man weighed daily for 26 years, weight varied by about 0.5% from one day to the next, small enough for a trend to show real change.
What it means for you
This phase ends when your weight trend reaches about 73.6 kg. You still see body fat, it just does not decide.
Sources
- Zemski et al. 2019 Same-Day Vs Consecutive-Day Precision Error of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Interpreting Body Composition Change in Resistance-Trained AthletesJ Clin Densitom · precision study, 21 resistance-trained athletes · abstract checked
- Schneditz et al. 2023 Day-to-day variability in euvolemic body massRen Fail · one healthy man, 9,521 days of weigh-ins · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/phaseTransition.ts (weight-based detection), roadmap.ts exitWeightKg
Your routeDecisions wait for a month of weigh-insA full month evens out water swings, including the menstrual cycle, before a phase is called done.Estimate
What the studies found
Across 612,613 menstrual cycles logged in an app, the average cycle was 29.3 days, so a 28-day average covers most of a cycle. On real smart-scale data, exponentially weighted averages were among the best ways to fill gaps between weigh-ins.
What it means for you
We need at least three weigh-ins over a week before showing a trend, and phase decisions use your last 28 days.
Sources
- Bull et al. 2019 Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cyclesNPJ Digit Med · app data, 612,613 cycles from 124,648 users · abstract checked
- Turicchi et al. 2020 Data Imputation and Body Weight Variability Calculation Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods in Data Collected From Digital Smart Scales: Simulation and Validation StudyJMIR Mhealth Uhealth · simulation and validation, 50 smart-scale users · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/phaseTransition.ts TREND_DECISION_DAYS, TREND_EWMA_DAYS, TREND_MIN_READINGS
Training16 hard sets a week for side deltsMore weekly sets grow more muscle, with smaller gains from each extra set at the top.Good
What the studies found
A 2026 analysis of 67 studies found more weekly sets meant more muscle and strength, with returns tapering, more so for strength. Counting sets where a muscle only assists as half a set fitted the data best. An earlier analysis put each extra weekly set at about 0.4% more growth.
What it means for you
16 sets a week is where your experience and choices put side delts. Sets where it only assists count as half.
Sources
- Pelland et al. 2026 The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength GainsSports Med · meta-regression, 67 studies, 2,058 participants · abstract checked
- Schoenfeld, Ogborn & Krieger 2017 Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysisJ Sports Sci · meta-analysis, 15 studies · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/data/volume-landmarks.json, check.ts positionRange/targetsFor
TrainingEach muscle about twice a weekSplitting the same weekly sets over two days grows muscle at least as well as one big day.Good
What the studies found
An early analysis of 10 studies found training a muscle twice a week grew it more than once. A larger 2019 analysis of 25 studies found that with weekly sets matched, frequency made no meaningful difference. So frequency mainly helps you fit the sets in.
What it means for you
Your 4-day plan trains most muscles twice a week, which spreads the sets into sessions you can finish.
Sources
- Schoenfeld, Ogborn & Krieger 2016 Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisSports Med · meta-analysis, 10 studies · abstract checked
- Schoenfeld, Grgic & Krieger 2019 How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequencyJ Sports Sci · meta-analysis, 25 studies · abstract checked
- Pelland et al. 2026 The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength GainsSports Med · meta-regression, 67 studies, 2,058 participants · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/generateProgram.ts TEMPLATES
TrainingMost sets in the 5 to 15 rep rangeLight and heavy weights build similar muscle when sets are hard. Heavier sets build more top-end strength.Good
What the studies found
Across 21 studies with sets taken to failure, light loads (60% of max or less) and heavy loads built similar muscle, while heavy loads gave bigger one-rep-max gains.
What it means for you
Big barbell lifts sit at 5 to 10 reps for strength and size; isolation moves sit at 10 to 15.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/data/rep-ranges.json
TrainingStop most sets a rep or three short of failureMuscle grows more as sets get close to failure, but going all the way adds little.Good
What the studies found
Muscle growth improved as sets ended closer to failure, while strength gains were similar across a wide range of effort, though the authors call this exploratory. A separate analysis of 15 studies found no evidence that training to true failure beats stopping short.
What it means for you
Each block starts a few reps short of failure and edges closer each week, and any exercise done as a single set goes to failure.
Sources
- Robinson et al. 2024 Exploring the Dose-Response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity to Failure, Strength Gain, and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Series of Meta-RegressionsSports Med · exploratory meta-regressions · abstract checked
- Refalo et al. 2023 Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysisSports Med · meta-analysis, 15 studies · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/data/rir.json
Training2 to 3 min rests on the big liftsResting more than a minute keeps your reps up. Past about 90 seconds, growth evens out.Good
What the studies found
A meta-analysis of 9 studies found a small growth benefit to resting more than 60 seconds, and no clear difference past 90. In trained men, 3-minute rests built more strength and thigh muscle than 1-minute rests. For maximum strength in trained lifters, a review favours rests over 2 minutes.
What it means for you
Your pace rests the big lifts for 2 to 3 minutes. A quicker pace trades a little growth for time.
Sources
- Singer et al. 2024 Give it a rest: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis on the effect of inter-set rest interval duration on muscle hypertrophyFront Sports Act Living · Bayesian meta-analysis, 9 studies · abstract checked
- Schoenfeld et al. 2016 Longer Interset Rest Periods Enhance Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Resistance-Trained MenJ Strength Cond Res · RCT, 21 resistance-trained men · abstract checked
- Grgic et al. 2018 Effects of Rest Interval Duration in Resistance Training on Measures of Muscular Strength: A Systematic ReviewSports Med · systematic review, 23 studies, 491 participants · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/data/rest.json, src/data/restPaceCopy.ts
TrainingA lighter week every 5 weeksA planned easier week lets fatigue clear. Coaches agree on it, but trials are few.Estimate
What the studies found
Expert coaches agree a deload is a planned stretch of reduced training to clear fatigue, and a practical review notes they are commonly placed every 4 to 8 weeks. In one trial, a full week off mid-programme did not change muscle growth but slightly reduced strength gains.
What it means for you
Your lighter week is the last of each 5-week block: about half the sets, same weights, more reps in reserve.
Sources
- Bell et al. 2023 Integrating Deloading into Strength and Physique Sports Training Programmes: An International Delphi Consensus ApproachSports Med Open · Delphi consensus, 21 to 34 expert coaches · abstract checked
- Bell et al. 2025 A Practical Approach to Deloading: Recommendations and Considerations for Strength and Physique SportsStrength Cond J · practical review · abstract checked
- Coleman et al. 2024 Gaining more from doing less? The effects of a one-week deload period during supervised resistance training on muscular adaptationsPeerJ · RCT, 39 trained adults · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/workoutGenerator/data/deload.json, generateProgram.ts deloadSets
TrainingYour training stays the same while you cutCutting back sets during a diet did not help trained men keep muscle.Estimate
What the studies found
Trained men dieting for 6 weeks did either 5 or 3 sets per exercise. Thigh muscle thickness showed no difference between groups, and the small loss of lean mass was similar in both.
What it means for you
Your sets are the same in every phase. Only the food changes.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/goalsProfile.ts phaseToVolumeTier
Meals170 g of protein a dayProtein helps muscle grow, and you need more when eating less, so cuts get the most.Good
What the studies found
Across 49 trials, protein added about 0.3 kg of lean mass to training, with no further gain above about 1.6 g per kg of body weight a day (the top of its confidence range was 2.2). When lean athletes cut calories, a review of 6 studies put needs higher, at 2.3 to 3.1 g per kg of lean mass.
What it means for you
170 g is about 2.2 g per kg of your weight. It rises as you get leaner on a cut, and never goes down.
Sources
- Morton et al. 2018 A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adultsBr J Sports Med · meta-analysis, 49 RCTs, 1,863 participants · full text checked
- Helms et al. 2014 A systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained lean athletes: a case for higher intakesInt J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab · systematic review, 6 studies · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/nutritionMacros.ts phaseProteinGrams
MealsEat 2,180 kcal, about 450 under maintenanceA deficit big enough to lose fat, capped where studies saw muscle gains stop.Good
What the studies found
Across resistance-training trials, a deficit of about 500 kcal a day stopped lean-mass gains, while strength still improved. So no cut here asks for more than 500, and leaner people get less.
What it means for you
Your deficit is about 450 kcal a day, which plans for about 0.4 kg a week.
Sources
In the code: src/utils/nutritionMacros.ts phaseCaloricTarget
MealsNever below 1,950 kcalEating too little for your training disrupts hormones, so calories never drop under a floor set by your lean mass.Estimate
What the studies found
In 29 regularly menstruating women, hormone pulses were normal at 30 kcal per kg of lean mass a day and disrupted below it. That study was small, short and in women who did not exercise, and the IOC 2023 consensus treats low energy availability as a health risk for athletes.
What it means for you
Your floor is 1,950 kcal: 30 kcal per kg of your lean mass plus what your training burns. We apply it whatever your sex.
Sources
- Loucks & Thuma 2003 Luteinizing hormone pulsatility is disrupted at a threshold of energy availability in regularly menstruating womenJ Clin Endocrinol Metab · controlled trial, 29 women, 5 days per condition · abstract checked
- Mountjoy et al. 2023 2023 International Olympic Committee's (IOC) consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs)Br J Sports Med · expert consensus statement · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/nutritionMacros.ts EA_FLOOR_KCAL_PER_KG_FFM
MealsMaintenance of about 2,630 kcalYour burn is estimated from your size, age, daily activity and training, so treat it as a starting point.Estimate
What the studies found
The Mifflin-St Jeor equation was built from measured resting energy in 498 adults. A systematic review found it predicted resting burn within 10% for more people than any other equation, but still with notable individual errors. Weight training is listed at 3.5 to 6.0 METs.
What it means for you
About 2,630 kcal from your body, your day and your training sessions. Your weigh-ins show whether it is right for you.
Sources
- Mifflin et al. 1990 A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individualsAm J Clin Nutr · measured resting energy expenditure, 498 adults · abstract checked
- Frankenfield et al. 2005 Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic reviewJ Am Diet Assoc · systematic review · abstract checked
- Herrmann et al. 2024 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activitiesJ Sport Health Sci · systematic review, 701 papers · full text checked
In the code: src/utils/nutritionMacros.ts tdeeFor, LIFESTYLE_MULTIPLIERS, TRAINING_SESSION_METS
MealsEat about 5% above maintenanceA small surplus feeds muscle growth. Eating more adds fat faster, not muscle.Estimate
What the studies found
Athletes given a bigger planned surplus gained more fat than those eating freely, with no difference in lean mass gained. An off-season review suggests about 10 to 20% over maintenance and gaining 0.25 to 0.5% of body weight a week, with advanced lifters going slower.
What it means for you
Your 5% sits at or below that range, because the more training you have behind you, the less extra food you can turn into muscle.
Sources
- Garthe et al. 2013 Effect of nutritional intervention on body composition and performance in elite athletesEur J Sport Sci · RCT, 39 elite athletes · abstract checked
- Iraki et al. 2019 Nutrition Recommendations for Bodybuilders in the Off-Season: A Narrative ReviewSports (Basel) · narrative review · abstract checked
In the code: src/utils/nutritionMacros.ts phaseCaloricTarget (bulk, lean_bulk)
MealsMacros worked out from weighed ingredientsEvery recipe is added up from USDA values per 100 g of each ingredient, not guessed.Good
What the studies found
USDA's FoodData Central brings together lab-analysed foundation foods, the long-standing SR Legacy tables, survey foods and branded products, and aims to be reliable and transparent. Each ingredient here carries values per 100 g from it.
What it means for you
Your plan converts every amount to grams first, then adds it up, so swapping a meal recalculates the day.
Sources
In the code: src/data/ingredients.ts macros_per_100g, src/utils/computeMacros.ts ingredientMacros
Numbers with a dotted underline are examples. In the app they're your own.
The reference files
The full working, file by file.
Nine reference documents, one per topic, with every source cited in full. These are the files the app's rules were written from. The page renders the files themselves, so they can never drift apart.
Coast for iPhone and Android
The rules, applied to you.
Your route, your week of meals and your program, built from the research above in about a minute.
Free · No ads · No account